Learn the Differences Between Block, File and Object Storage.

Foundations of Data Engineering

Zaid Alissa Almaliki
7 min readAug 13, 2022
Block vs File Vs Object Storage

A comparison of block, file, and object storage, outlining the main distinctions between them and which best suits your needs.

Data is one of your company’s most significant assets. You must choose where and how to keep each individual piece of data as well as bigger data sets, including those from big data analytics, financial information, personnel records, and bespoke applications.

Although businesses frequently use a variety of storage devices, storage choices should be based on the individual pieces of data. This article will give a high-level understanding of each storage technology block, file, and object as well as how each affects how business choices are made.

As file interfaces on object storage and object interfaces on file storage are both common in modern businesses, knowing the original purpose of each storage strategy can be helpful as you assess storage technologies and how they align with your particular business objectives.

From a technological standpoint, improving business choices begins with the external interface and the underlying storage architecture.

Block Storage

This is the most basic type of storage from the outside. It functions as a kind of operating system and database operating system. For what is occurring above it, the data block acts as an abstraction. The sub-system may update certain blocks since it is aware of the addresses of the blocks (data segments).

Block storage is perfect for low latency, high transaction situations because software and other data structures, like files, are made up of thousands of blocks and can be updated in granular segments. If anything changes, you simply need to update a small portion of the data rather than the complete piece.

Use Cases:

Use cases for block storage are:

  • Databases’ storage.
  • RAID volumes.
  • Data storage for critical systems that impact business operations.
  • Data storage in file systems for operating systems for virtualization software vendors.

Block storage systems are the chosen technology for databases because of their comparatively swift and dependable performance. Block storage supports corporate applications well for the same reason that it supports databases well. For transaction-based business applications, block storage guarantees that users are served promptly and reliably. Because data is dispersed over numerous volumes, virtual machine file systems (VMFS) like VMware frequently employ block storage.

File Storage

The traditional method of storing data is file-based storage. And it’s about as simple as it gets, like most ancient things. Files are given names, metadata tags, and then are arranged in folders beneath directories and subdirectories.

They are quite simple to arrange thanks to the common naming pattern, and storage innovations like NAS (Network-Attached Storage) make it simple to share files locally. A centralised, convenient method of file and folder storage is required by many businesses.

These benefits may be obtained via file-level storage at a price that is often within the reach of small businesses. You have a hierarchal structure with file-level storage that is excellent at managing relatively tiny quantities of data.

However, a competent IT administrator who has handled this type of architecture most likely attests to its flaws. Yes, theoretically you are entitled to create and store an infinite number of files. But with time, just searching for those files becomes a tremendous effort. The headache grows as you gather more files. browsing a large number of folders. To find the one you need, you must scroll through hundreds of files. It’s unpleasant.

Use Cases:

File Storage Despite its shortcomings, file-level storage is appropriate in a variety of situations, such as:

  • File sharing: If all you need is a location to save and distribute files within the office, file-level storage is the way to go.
  • Archiving locally: File-level storage is a cost-effective choice for archiving information in a small data centre setting due to the scale-out NAS solution’s ability to accept scaling without causing any noticeable performance degradation.
  • Data security: File-level storage is a workable data security option when combined with simple setup, support for common protocols, native replication, and different disc technologies.
File Storage

Object Storage

A technique known as object storage separates data into discrete, self-contained entities and stores them again in a flat setting with all objects at the same level. Compared to how files are stored, there are no folders or subdirectories. Object storage does not keep all of the data in a single file, either.

Additionally, objects have metadata, which is data about the file that aids in processing and usefulness. Users can generate both the key and value for custom metadata linked with an object, or they can set the value for fixed-key information with object storage.

Each item has a unique number, which may be used to retrieve it instead of a file name and location. On local hard drives and cloud servers, objects can be kept. To access and manage objects, however, you need to use an Application Programming Interface (API), unlike with file storage.

Use Cases:

  • IoT data management: Object storage is a viable option for the fast-growing volumes of IoT data being acquired and handled, especially in the industrial and healthcare sectors. This is due to its ability to expand quickly and retrieve data with ease.
  • Email: Because object storage is scalable and affordable, organisations that must save huge volumes of emails for historical and compliance reasons frequently choose it as their main repository.
  • Video Monitoring: For businesses that need to save a lot of video recordings and maintain the content for several years, object storage is an economical solution.
The Features of each type

Evaluating of Cloud Storage Features

In this section, we look at storage possibilities from several cloud providers.
We’ll examine the differences and noteworthy features of AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud Platform (GCP).

As the worldwide movement toward remote and asynchronous work continues, so do our data storage requirements. So it’s no wonder that storage has grown critical to cloud providers and provides a reasonably simple option for businesses to get started with cloud.

Block Storage Differences:

Block storage is your best option if you have a requirement for speed. It’s similar to a raw hard disc. The greatest IOPS will be offered by it. Because block storage is essentially necessary to host virtual machines, all three cloud providers offer it. Our virtual machines’ ability to boot into their operating system is made possible by block storage.

  • Amazon Elastic Block Store is what AWS names its block storage service (Amazon EBS).
  • In Azure, they are managed disks.
  • GCP has solid-state discs and persistent discs.

File Storage Differences:

Input/output operations per second, or IOPS, is the unit of measurement to use when selecting a high-performance storage option. File storage can help with this. Consider it to be somewhat similar to your network’s shared disc. Common file storage services will provide other systems access through Network File System (NFS) or Server Message Block (SMB), enabling them to connect across the network and utilise the storage as if it were a local volume.

  • Amazon Elastic File System is the name of AWS’s file storage service (Amazon EFS).
  • Azure refers to them as Files.
  • GCP also offers a Filestore.

However, AWS outperforms the competition with two more file storage choices. Both Amazon FSX for Lustre (POSIX-compliant), where high-performance computation is required, and Amazon FSX for Windows are designed for usage in Windows server settings.

Object Storage Differences:

AWS calls their object storage service Amazon Simple Storage Service, or S3 for short. GCP has the aptly named Google Cloud Storage. And Azure calls their service Azure Blob Storage (BLOB means “binary large object”). Both AWS and GCP call the things you put your data into a “bucket”, while Azure calls it a “container”.

Many of these storage services are similar. They all provide:

  • Encryption at rest.
  • Granular security, providing choices to make an object totally private or publicly accessible.
Cloud Storage Differences

Pricing:

How do these major cloud providers differ in terms of storage pricing?

Here’s a comparison of prices in similar regions: AWS US East (Northern Virginia), Azure East US, and Google Cloud Northern Virginia (us-east4).

Cloud Provider Storage(GB/Month):

Amazon S3: $0.023
Azure Blob Storage: $0.021
Google Cloud Platform Cloud Storage: $0.023

The Future of Data Storage

In spite of COVID-19’s ongoing effects, one thing is certain: demand for data storage will continue to rise in the years to come.

Worldwide data creation is expected to expand at a CAGR of 23% through 2025, exceeding the global storage capacity’s CAGR of 19.2%, according to analyst company IDC. What does this means in terms of popular storage?

According to IDC predictions, spinning discs will hold around 54% of the data by 2024, making HDD the leading storage technology. Even though that implies a reduction of 11% from its share in 2019, the rebalancing takes place within the framework of a continually growing pie.

Nearline HDD continues to be the preferred option for data storage capacity within the mix, which is likely not unexpected given the balance of data storage spillage to the cloud data storage facility From 14% in 2018 to 18% in 2024, tape’s market share is increasing, as is SSD.

Worldwide Byte Shipments by Storage Media Type

Thanks for reading. If you loved this article, feel free to hit that follow button so we can stay in touch.

--

--

Zaid Alissa Almaliki
Zaid Alissa Almaliki

Written by Zaid Alissa Almaliki

Data Engineer, LinkedIn and Twitter Top Voice. Contributing to leading platforms like Towards Data Science.

No responses yet